I mentioned this on twitter last week, but I think it might be worth exploring in a little more depth here with our blog readers.
The US Department of Transportation Secretary, Ray LaHood is blogging.
These days a blogging politico is no surprise. However, the things he’s saying have kind of caught me off guard (in a good way):
- “Bicycling is an important factor in less carbon-intensive commuting”
- “When I told the League of American Bicyclists National Bike Summit that “Cyclists are important users of America’s transportation systems,” I meant it.”
- “And, when I wrote that “With DOT, bicyclists have a full partner in working toward livable communities,” I meant that as well.”
To cyclists, these statements are pretty logical. We get all of this and many of us have been saying the same thing for years. But the problem hasn’t been saying, it’s been the listening. That is, getting the Beltway to listen, and take us seriously (remember last summer’s anti-bike rant by N.C. Rep Patrick McHenry?).

I recently scored a smokin’ deal on some telemark skis on craigslist. Because I harbor a special guilt about my addiction to making turns (pretty much the only reason we own a car is for getting to the ski hills, and I don’t even want to think about the massive carbon footprint of the ski industry), I sure wasn’t going to drive to
I went to the South by Southwest Interactive festival (







